If you've lived in, are living in or have friends in the UK it's almost impossible that you would have missed that the elections just took place. But like me, you probably didn't pay very much attention because it wasn't very interesting.
On Facebook, I wrote a status encouraging people to vote, I wasn't espousing any particular party, I just strongly believe that everyone should excercise their democratic right. Democracy was a hard earned prize, (even harder earned for some of us than others!) and apathy or complacency is a poor thanks to that institution. One friend wrote in reply to my status that the top UK Google search was "who should I vote for". He then commented that this was an indication that democracy was in a very poor state indeed. Which got me thinking...
What is it about this particular election that was so uninspiring? Why did voters turn to google for answers that should have been annunciated through the rhetoric of the candidates?
Cameron and Milliband are two of the more flacid candidates to ever grace the British poltical stage. Shrunken and awkward they are the product of British factories of political candidates (aka Oxford and the London School of Economics). The centre right and centre left parties have congealed together into a tolerant moderatism. A taupe-beige melange that inspires nobody and is destroying the Westiminster democracy like a slow and irreversible cancer. And I just keep asking myself, is it even possible to be a "centred politician" have a backbone and be a passionate leader?
When you get leadership candidates like Milliband and Cameron - you also get candidates like Nigel Farage. Plenty of passion and backbone, articulate and quick with the statistics - he just also happens to come across as a rascist bigot. Winston Peters cloned and twenty years younger.
Boris Johson, the rightful heir to the throne (not literally) was bought off and tucked away as mayor of London so that he was not tempted to pursue national leadership. Perhaps his return heralds a new and glorious age. Perhaps.
The surprise card in this election was the SNP otherwise known as the Kilted Coup. They are led by the dark horse on the UK leadership stage - she's intelligent, she's articulate and she's Scottish. Not Scottish in the Gordon Brown - bore you to death kind of way. But Scottish in the Braveheart "You can take my life, but you can never take my freedom" kind of way. The problem being that this dynamic country "beyond the wall" is making a clear and coherrant case to be a different country. Nicola Sturgeon belongs to Scotland. Not Britain.
I don't think the problem here is voter apathy. The problem is politicians who are refrained from expressing themselves, fail to inspire and apply this floppy handshake manner to every issue that crosses their desk. I'm not advocating a shift away from moderate policies, but I am calling for the next generation of UK leaders to please stand up.
The time has come for the next Thatcher, Blair or Churchill. The future of your country is at stake.
On Facebook, I wrote a status encouraging people to vote, I wasn't espousing any particular party, I just strongly believe that everyone should excercise their democratic right. Democracy was a hard earned prize, (even harder earned for some of us than others!) and apathy or complacency is a poor thanks to that institution. One friend wrote in reply to my status that the top UK Google search was "who should I vote for". He then commented that this was an indication that democracy was in a very poor state indeed. Which got me thinking...
What is it about this particular election that was so uninspiring? Why did voters turn to google for answers that should have been annunciated through the rhetoric of the candidates?
Cameron and Milliband are two of the more flacid candidates to ever grace the British poltical stage. Shrunken and awkward they are the product of British factories of political candidates (aka Oxford and the London School of Economics). The centre right and centre left parties have congealed together into a tolerant moderatism. A taupe-beige melange that inspires nobody and is destroying the Westiminster democracy like a slow and irreversible cancer. And I just keep asking myself, is it even possible to be a "centred politician" have a backbone and be a passionate leader?
When you get leadership candidates like Milliband and Cameron - you also get candidates like Nigel Farage. Plenty of passion and backbone, articulate and quick with the statistics - he just also happens to come across as a rascist bigot. Winston Peters cloned and twenty years younger.
Boris Johson, the rightful heir to the throne (not literally) was bought off and tucked away as mayor of London so that he was not tempted to pursue national leadership. Perhaps his return heralds a new and glorious age. Perhaps.
The surprise card in this election was the SNP otherwise known as the Kilted Coup. They are led by the dark horse on the UK leadership stage - she's intelligent, she's articulate and she's Scottish. Not Scottish in the Gordon Brown - bore you to death kind of way. But Scottish in the Braveheart "You can take my life, but you can never take my freedom" kind of way. The problem being that this dynamic country "beyond the wall" is making a clear and coherrant case to be a different country. Nicola Sturgeon belongs to Scotland. Not Britain.
I don't think the problem here is voter apathy. The problem is politicians who are refrained from expressing themselves, fail to inspire and apply this floppy handshake manner to every issue that crosses their desk. I'm not advocating a shift away from moderate policies, but I am calling for the next generation of UK leaders to please stand up.
The time has come for the next Thatcher, Blair or Churchill. The future of your country is at stake.

